Constructive alignment of materials in tertiary programs

Full paper

Download the paper [PDF]

Sook Jhee Yoon
The University of Melbourne
@sookjhee

Paul Gruba
The University of Melbourne

Catch this session

Wednesday 6 December, 12pm - 12.30pm
Stream 5
Room C204

Abstract

In blended tertiary programs, technology is mixed in face to face settings, and learning activities happen both on- and offline. With the move towards blended learning, tertiary programs and their curricula have become more varied and complicated. Such complexity and variation is evident, for example, in the program learning outcomes, learning activities and assessment tasks. Yet little is known how such complex factors interact, and thus influence, decisions regarding the curriculum in higher education settings from the perspective of administrators, lecturers and students. This study examines constructive alignment of materials in blended tertiary programs. Two case studies of blended programs in a large research intensive Australian university were studied. Using a pedagogical claims analysis as a means to structure the study, the researchers gathered and analysed qualitative data through a series of cycles, seeking to refine themes such that they are defensible, trustworthy and rigorous. Findings of the study point to factors that influence constructive alignment with implications for materials design and use.

About the authors

Sook Jhee Yoon

Sook Jhee Yoon is a Ph.D candidate in The University of Melbourne. Her areas of interest are materials development and the use of technology in language teaching.

Paul Gruba

Paul Gruba, originally trained as a journalist, works in areas of educational technology research to do with non-native speakers, blended language learning and language program evaluation. Paul is currently an associate editor for AJET.


It takes a village: Supporting the integration of digital textbooks in higher education

Full paper

Download the paper [PDF]

Debborah Smith
Bond University

Catch this session

Wednesday 6 December, 12pm - 12.30pm
Stream 4
Room L209

Abstract

Digital textbooks now incorporate various technological enhancements, and offer many opportunities for learning and teaching in higher education. Despite some enthusiasm for this medium, lecturers tend not to integrate the extra activities into their courses preferring instead to simply have them available as optional extra activities for students. One reason for this barrier to use is the time and effort required to integrate technology into the curriculum in a meaningful way, and lecturers may feel they lack the necessary knowledge to do this effectively. Despite the existence of institutional support to assist educators with technology enhanced learning, the services don’t always align with what faculty want or need. As a result, there have been calls to improve staff training and professional development. This paper presents a theorised inquiry into educators’ reflections on the integration of digital textbooks using Mishra & Koehler’s TPACK framework as an underpinning theory. The findings suggest the need for training and support that is individualised to instructors’ specific needs, and allows for increased collaboration between various stakeholders. It is concluded that professional development that focusses on the development of TPACK, and operates within a collaborative and context-specific learning community could support the increased uptake of digital textbooks in higher education.

About the authors

Debborah Smith

Debborah is in the final year of her PhD candidature at Bond University under the supervision of Professor Jeff Brand, Professor Shelley Kinash, and Dr Donna Henson. Her research is investigating factors that influence higher education teachers’ adoption and use of digital textbooks. Debborah’s background areas of teaching expertise are English as a Second Language and academic skills development, and she is presently employed in the role of Student Experience Advisor at the University of Sunshine Coast, Fraser Coast Campus.


Competence-based assessment and digital badging as guidance in vocational teacher education

Full paper

Download the paper [PDF]

Sanna Brauer
University of Lapland
@sannabrauer

Pirkko Siklander
University of Oulu
@pirkkosiklander

Catch this session

Monday 4 December, 10.30am - 11am
Stream 3
Room L206

Abstract

Digital pedagogy means applying new technologies to teaching and learning in online, hybrid and face-to-face learning environments. Digital open badges, a set of micro-credentials, support equal and egalitarian competence-based assessment models. Criterion-based digital badging combined with gamification promise learning solutions that have the potential to improve learning outcomes substantially. The aim of this study is to investigate how a competence-based assessment process in an open badge management system enhances learning and guides students to improved learning outcomes. The theoretical framework is focused on concepts of gamification and instructional badging.
Data were collected in 2016 from group interviews (n=6) of trained Finnish professional teachers (n=17) along with students in vocational teacher education (n=12) who earned 645 badges over one year in the Professional Development (PD) program, Learning Online.

Inductive thematic analysis revealed several significant features of competence-based assessment and badge management, which reflected the students' individual experiences of the optimal form and frequency of assessments, feedback, guidance and advice. The preliminary results of this study emphasise the importance of open study groups and the option of joining and leaving the learning network freely. Shared expertise and shared learning experiences increase cohesion within freely formed study groups. The results of this study show the challenges and opportunities involved in badge management from the perspective of digital guidance and gamification, providing additional insight into the design and development of badge-driven learning in the future. This paper suggests that researchers should consider using a badge management application as an environment to guide badge-driven learning.

About the authors

Sanna Brauer

Ms Sanna Brauer (PhD Researcher, Senior Lecturer) works in Oulu University of Applied Sciences, School of Vocational Teacher Education. Her expertise is in competence-based teacher education and gamified learning solutions. She is a passionate developer and at home with early adopters. She has developed teaching and learning processes and online environments for several institutions and degrees. Her doctoral dissertation deals with gamified professional development program for vocational teachers, aiming to enhance learning outcomes based on digital badging. Earlier, she has co-ordinated development of vocational education and learning environments for the National Board of Education in Finland. (home page: https://www.linkedin.com/in/sannabrauer/)

Pirkko Siklander

Ms Pirkko Siklander (PhD, Docent, University Researcher) works in the University of Oulu, in the LET (Learning, Education and Technology) research team. Her expertise is in technology-enhanced and collaborative learning and teaching in different age groups, and teacher education programmes. She runs international LET Master’s Degree Programme. In addition, she has developed teaching and learning processes, where playfulness and creative collaboration are employed and studied. Her doctoral dissertation deals with affordances of playful learning environment. Earlier, she worked as an Associate Professor in collaborative learning and diverse learning environments in the University of Lapland. (home page: https://pirkkohyvonen.wordpress.com/


Internet of Things (IoT), PBL and 3D holographic modelling for smart agriculture education at The University of Queensland

Full paper

Download the paper [PDF]

Kim Bryceson
The University of Queensland
@kimpob742

Amando Navas Borrero
The University of Queensland

Fabian Vasuian
The University of Queensland

Catch this session

Wednesday 6 December 12pm - 12.30pm
Stream 1
Room H102 Allison Dickson Lecture Theatre

Abstract

The project described in this paper builds an innovative educational ‘front end’ to exciting technological developments in real time biophysical data gathering that are currently happening at The University of Queensland (UQ)’s regional campus (UQ Gatton ~85km SW of Brisbane in SE Queensland), via an Internet of Things (IoT) UQ Smart Campus Project. This paper describes the technologies involved, the development of a multifaceted web-based interface (dashboard) to the data collected, problem based learning modules, and 3D modelling using the real time streaming data acquired through the Internet of Things (IoT) technology of the UQ Gatton Smart Campus Initiative. The idea is to produce innovative teaching and assessment modules for multiple different courses in the UQ Science Faculty. The challenges and workarounds and two examples of using the data collected for problem-based learning modules will be described. Some discussion is included on what these technologies could provide in relation to delivering virtual reality, augmented reality and mixed reality environments for further teaching & learning developments in the “E” space being trialed currently with partners UQ ITS, Telstra/Readify, and Labster.

About the authors

Kim Bryceson

Kim is Professor of Agribusiness and Associate Dean Academic of the Science Faculty at the University of Queensland. Early research involved developing and implementing computer and satellite technology for integrated pest management, drought monitoring, site specific management and agribusiness decision support system development with the Commonwealth and Qld State governments. Over the last 15 years in academe she has been involved in agrifood supply and value chain analysis domestically and internationally with particular focus on using various modelling tools to construct supply chain risk assessment and performance management scenarios. She is the Director of the Agricultural Remote Sensing Laboratory at UQ’s Gatton campus where the collection of real time streaming Big Data through an Internet of Things infrastructure, plus the design, building and use of small drone technology and robotics for agricultural and environmental monitoring and sub-tropical agricultural research and teaching, is flourishing.

Amando Navas Borrero

An electrical engineer by first degree and professional experience, Armando has a family background in the cattle industry and is currently undertaking a PhD at the Agricultural Remote Sensing Lab at UQGatton specialising in the development and operationalisation of an Internet of Things data collection infrastructure as a tool for creating better management solutions for farmers

Fabian Vasuian

Fabian has completed a dual BEng / BSc in 2016 at UQ and after completing the required Internship for the BEng at the Agricultural Remote Sensing Lab in 2015/2016 at UQGatton, he is now working as a Systems Engineer with the UQ Gatton Smart Campus Internet of Things project, primarily delivering on the Data Dashboard product


Micro-credentialing is the future of higher education

Debate

Ekaterina Pechenkina
Swinburne University of Technology
@DrKatya_Pech

Juliet Buchanan
Swinburne University of Technology

Catch this session

Monday 4 December, 2.30pm - 3pm
Stream 3
Room L206

Abstract

The debate features an education researcher and a learning designer coming together to discuss pros and cons of micro-credentialing. Traditionally understood as an alternative credentialing practice, micro-credentialing draws on the principles of the competency-based approach and employs various micro-rewards (e.g. digital badges) to signify learner achievements, such as mastering a skill or gaining knowledge of a particular subject. Micro-credentialing can also be understood more broadly as a dis/re-aggregation of learning process, in which students are allowed greater control over their educational pathway choices. In addition to discussing benefits and challenges associated with increased student control over their learning, the debate addresses other matters of relevance to micro-credentialing, such as universities’ responsiveness to student expectations and how micro-credentialing can be used to improve graduate outcomes in alignment with industry specific needs. The learning designer will debate the affirmative side and the academic will debate the negative side of micro-credentialing, leaving it up to the audience to decide who makes the most convincing argument.

About the authors

Ekaterina Pechenkina

Dr Katya (Ekaterina) Pechenkina is Research Fellow at the Learning Transformations Unit, Swinburne University of Technology. Katya holds a PhD in anthropology from the University of Melbourne and several other degrees. She was a 2003-2004 International Research and Exchange Board fellow at the California State University Bakersfield, where she majored in sociology. Anthropologist and education researcher, Katya’s research interests encompass the discourses of technology, innovation, teaching excellence, and Indigenous experiences in higher education. Katya has published widely and serves as a peer reviewer for several major journals, conferences and publishers. Katya is a member of the teaching team delivering Swinburne’s Graduate Certificate in Learning and Teaching (Higher Education): she convenes and teaches a unit focusing on scholarly teaching designed to help academic staff to explore, evaluate and improve their teaching practices. Katya is an avid social media user and can be found on Twitter @DrKatya_Pech and Facebook @DrKatyaPech

Juliet Buchanan

Ms Juliet Buchanan is a Senior Learning Designer based at Learning Transformations Unit, Swinburne University of Technology. Juliet obtained a Master of Education from the University of Melbourne (2011), a Postgraduate Diploma in Computer Education, The University of Melbourne, 1999 and a Bachelor of Arts (Education), Deakin University. Juliet has a broad range of educational experience in a range of institutions including learning design at Monash and Swinburne universities; learning design experience in Australasian specialist medical colleges, RACMA, RVTS and RACS; teaching experience in primary schools, TAFE and industry experience, training Flight Attendants at QANTAS. Juliet has experience across institutions and in industry designing and creating LMS and online modules.


The effect of digital game-based language learning mobile application on the development of complexity, accuracy, and fluency in foreign language monologic oral production among Chinese Learners of English as a Foreign Language

Concise paper

Download the paper [PDF]

Feifei Han
The University of Sydney

Zehua Wang
Shaanxi Xueqian Normal University

Catch this session

Tuesday 5 December, 11am - 11.20am
Stream 1
Room H102

Abstract

The study reports the effect of a digital game-based language learning (DGBLL) mobile application “Speaking English Fluently – An Automated Scoring Artificial Intelligent Tutoring System on Spoken English” on the complexity, accuracy, and fluency in foreign language (FL) monologic oral production among 31 second year Chinese university learners of English as a foreign language (EFL). The participants’ monological oral production was measured in the first (week 1) and last (week 21) weeks of a semester using the same narrative picture description task. The oral production was audio-recorded and transcribed. Both the transcripts and audio-files were analyzed on the complexity, accuracy, and fluency dimensions. The complexity was measured using the number of Mean (M) words per T-unit, the accuracy dimension was measured using the number of repairs and errors per 100 words; and the fluency dimension was measured via speech rate (i.e., number of words per minute), and M length of pauses. Students were required to download the mobile application and followed the monological practice section twice a week for 30 minutes each time. Using paired sample t-tests, we found that even though the participants’ repair rate and speech rate remained unchanged, they produced more complex monological speech, had significantly fewer errors, and reduced average length of pauses after 20 weeks treatment using the mobile application, demonstrating a positive effect of the DGBLL mobile application on FL learners’ monological oral production.

About the authors

Feifei Han

Feifei Han currently is an educational researcher at the University of Sydney. Her current research interests comprise of three broad themes: (1) language and literacy education; (2) teaching, learning, and educational technology in higher education, and (3) educational psychology.

Zehua Wang

Zehua Wang obtained a Bachelor of Arts (2010) from Xi’an International Studies University, and a Master of Education (2013) from the University of Sydney. Currently she is a Lecturer in the Department of English at Shaanxi Xueqian Normal University, Xi’an, China. Her current research interests are (1) language learning strategies and (2) educational technology in higher education. Ms. Wang has received funding on four research projects in China and she has published a number of journal articles.


The power of Us: Investigating the value of interaction and community in postgraduate studies

Concise paper

Download the paper [PDF]

Oriel Kelly
New Zealand Tertiary College
@oriel.kelly

Nuhisifa Seve-Williams
New Zealand Tertiary College

Binky Laureta
New Zealand Tertiary College

Keshni Kumar
New Zealand Tertiary College

Catch this session

Tuesday 5 December, 11am - 11.20am
Stream 2
Room R113

Abstract

The power of community – of Us – has long been assumed to be important in adult learning. Student interactions on discussion forums are encouraged, and it has been claimed that they foster a learning community which makes a difference to student outcomes through collaboration and joint construction of knowledge. This paper reports on interim results of a research project to establish, firstly, if there is a correlation between student participation in forums and their overall course outcomes, and secondly, shares a matrix designed to code both social and cognitive forum activity, to support an investigation into the existence of a learning community in student forum conversations – the power of Us.

About the authors

Oriel Kelly

Oriel Kelly is the Academic Manager at NZTC. She has a Masters in Educational Administration and her tertiary background is in staff development, the uses of technology to support teaching and learning and educational leadership. She is a Fellow of the New Zealand Association for Educational Administration and Leadership and a winner of a New Zealand national Tertiary Teaching Excellence Award. Her research interests include learning technology, online communities and the NZ eLearning Guidelines. She has been teaching online now over 15 years, five with NZTC.

Nuhisifa Seve-Williams

Dr Nuhisifa Seve-Williams hails from the island of Niue but raised in NZ.
She completed her PhD in Education Sociology in 2009 from the University of Auckland. She is currently the Research Manager at NZTC.

Binky Laureta

Binky Laureta has a Masters in Family Life and Child Development and is a registered teacher in early childhood education. She has been involved in teaching for 20 years, both overseas, and in New Zealand. She started her career as a preschool teacher and then joined the tertiary sector. Currently, she is working as lecturer and Program Leader for the Graduate Diploma in Teaching ECE program at New Zealand Tertiary College. Her interests are in inclusive education, social competency, cultural diversity, multicultural education, adult/higher education teaching and learning, teacher training, online teaching and learning, curriculum and learning support.

Keshni Kumar

Keshni Kumar has a Postgraduate Diploma in Education and has 17 years experience in education. Her research interests are in science and early childhood education, and other curriculum areas. She is currently a lecturer in early childhood at NZTC.


The synergistic and dynamic relationship between learning design and learning analytics

Concise paper

Download the paper [PDF]

Dirk Ifenthaler
University of Mannheim
@ifenthaler

David Gibson
Curtin University
@davidgibson

Eva Dobozy
Curtin University
@edobozy27

Catch this session

Tuesday 5 December, 11.20am - 11.40am
Stream 3
Room L206

Abstract

The synergistic relationship between learning design and learning analytics has the potential for improving learning and teaching in near real-time. The potential for integrating the newly available and dynamic information from ongoing analysis into learning design requires new perspectives on learning and teaching data processing and analysis as well as advanced theories, methods, and tools for supporting dynamic learning design processes. Three perspectives of learning analytics design provide summative, real-time, and predictive insights. In a case study with 3,550 users, the navigation sequence and network graph analysis demonstrate the potential of learning analytics design. The study aims to demonstrate how the analysis of navigation patterns and network graph analysis could inform the learning design of self-guided digital learning experiences. Even with open-ended freedom, only 608 sequences were evidenced by learners out of a potential number of hundreds of millions of sequences. Advancements of learning analytics design have the potential for mapping the cognitive, social and even physical states of the learner and optimise their learning environment on the fly.

About the authors

Dirk Ifenthaler

Dirk Ifenthaler is Professor and Chair of Learning, Design and Technology at University of Mannheim. His research focuses on the intersection of cognitive psychology, educational technology, data analytics, and organisational learning. Dirk’s research outcomes include numerous co-authored books, book series, book chapters, journal articles, and international conference papers, as well as successful grant funding in Australia, Germany, and USA. He is the Editor-in-Chief of the Springer journal Technology, Knowledge and Learning (www.ifenthaler.info).

David Gibson

Professor David Gibson, Director of Learning Futures at Curtin University in Australia and UNESCO Chair of Data Science in Higher Education Learning and Teaching, received his doctorate (Ed.D. Leadership and Policy Studies) from the University of Vermont in 1999 based on a study of complex systems modeling of educational change. His foundational research demonstrated the feasibility of bridging from qualitative information to quantifiable dynamic relationships in complex models that verify trajectories of organizational change. He provides thought leadership as a researcher, professor, learning scientist and innovator. He is creator of simSchool, a classroom flight simulator for preparing educators, and eFolio an online performance-based assessment system, and provides vision and sponsorship for Curtin University’s Challenge, a mobile, game-based learning platform. He consults with project and system leaders, formulates strategies, and helps people articulate their vision for innovation; then helps connect people with the resources needed to fulfill their aspirations. His research has extended from learning analytics, complex systems analysis and modeling of education to application of complexity via games and simulations in teacher education, web applications and the future of learning. Dr. Gibson has also advanced the use of technology to personalize education via cognitive modeling, design and implementation.

Eva Dobozy

Associate Professor Eva Dobozy is Deputy Dean, Learning and Teaching in the Curtin Business School. She is engaged in Learning Design research, investigating the efficacy of traditional and new technology-enhanced learning and teaching offerings. Dr Dobozy is involved in the discovery, integration, application and testing of new learning design models and frameworks. Currently, she is working as part of a learning design group on the design and implementation of transdisciplinary pedagogical templates. Her research spans the intersection between learning theory, learning design, technology-enhanced learning and teacher professional development. She is the winner of a number of prestigious research and teaching awards. Her current research focuses on sustainable futures in higher education and the pedagogical modelling of novel course designs and quality assurance practices.


Transforming exams: How IT works for BYOD e-exams

Concise paper

Download the paper [PDF]

Mathew Hillier
Monash University
@mathewhillier

Andrew Fluck
University of Tasmania
@AndrewFluck

Catch this session

Monday 4 December, 2.10pm - 2.30pm
Stream 4
Room L209

Abstract

This paper focuses on the 'IT' side of a bring-your-own-device (BYOD) based e-Exam system developed as part of an Australian government funded project (transformingexams.com). The context for the use of our e-Exam solution is the supervised space of the exam room. A key element of the work is to enable authentic forms of assessment. To this end we have designed the solution to allow complex constructed problems that can be addressed using a range of contemporary 'e-tools of the trade'. The system works with BYOD where students boot their own laptop using a specially crafted USB stick that contains a standardised operating system and a suite of applications. By giving teachers and students access to contemporary software tools we are providing the opportunity to greatly expand the pedagogical landscape of the exam room encouraging more authentic assessment practices.

The paper provides technical details of both the e-Exam USBs used for the student test environment and newly developed tools used to streamline the deployment of exam data and retrieval of student responses. A phased strategy is outlined for moving from paper based exams via paper-equivalent e-exams through to post-paper exams involving multimedia, a range of software applications, quiz engine and then onto whitelisted network resources and fully logged Internet access enabled during an exam. The roles of groups (Us-s) and individuals (Me-s) within the process of running an e-exam are outlined by comparing current paper-based exam workflows and that of e-exams to provide a richer description of the approach.

About the authors

Mathew Hillier

Dr Mathew Hillier is a Senior Lecturer in the Office of Learning and Teaching at Monash University. Mathew is one of two co-leaders of the ASCILITE SIG for 'e-Assessment' and in this capacity is a co-host of the Transforming Assessment webinar series along with Prof Geoffrey Crisp.

He specialises in e-assessment and e-exams and teaches into the academic staff development program at Monash University leading the 'technology and space' theme. He has previously taught into Business, Information systems, Engineering and Arts programs at several universities in Australia, Singapore and Hong Kong. Mathew is currently the leader of the 'Transforming Exams' project developing a toolset for authentic, computerised, high-stakes assessment (e-Exams). The project covers 10 university partners and is funded by a half-million dollar Australian government grant. He is also leading the development of a multi-language computerised exam platform for use in national professional translator accreditation. More about Mathew at http://ta.vu/mathewhillier

Andrew Fluck

Dr Andrew Fluck is a Senior Lecturer in Information Technology in the Faculty of Education at University of Tasmania.

Dr. Fluck trained as a teacher in Bristol, England. He has taught science, mathematics and computing in Nigeria, England and Australia. His numerous publications reflect his research interests in the transformational potential of computers in education. He was a co-author of the government report 'Making Better Connections' and the book 'Seven steps to ICT integration'. His funded research investigates the use of computers to teach integral calculus and quantum mechanics in primary schools; and eExaminations, where students take their own computers into the exam hall. He is a past secretary of the Australian Council for Computers in Education (ACCE) and is now the chair of Working Group 3.3 (research into educational applications of information technologies) for IFIP/UNESCO. Andrew is also an avid longbow archer and continental archery judge. Andrew's website http://Andrew.Fluck.id.au


Generating learning through the crowd: The role of social media practices in supporting students as producers at scale

Full paper

Download the paper [PDF]

Peter Bryant
London School of Economics and Political Science
@peterbryantHE

Catch this session

Wednesday 6 December, 11am - 11.30am
Stream 3
Room L206

Abstract

Social media and higher education pedagogy have enjoyed a chequered relationship with significant debates about the efficacy of social media as a site of student centred learning, the manager/host of an individual’s learning trajectory and as a tool of facilitating collaborative learning at scale. This paper presents the findings from the evaluation of Constitution UK, an innovative civic engagement and open learning project run by the London School of Economics in the UK. This was the lead initiative in an institution wide shift in pedagogical approach that was designed to transform the learning experiences of students through supporting students to be co-producers of knowledge. The Students as Producers project (SAP@LSE) was aligned to the School’s learning experiences curricular enhancement objectives, which sought to transform the student experience from primarily didactic to one that prepared the learner for the challenges of work and practice and engaged them in their own learning, through making. The LSE have been engaged in a number of projects that use crowdsourcing and citizenship as a catalyst for learning. The core principle behind these initiatives is that learning is a complex and agile process in the post-digital age and can be significantly enhanced through student led community learning, peer learning and informal learning. Wanting to engage our students more actively in the shaping of their study, their learning and their career, we designed a linked series of projects inform to varying degrees by social media practices. We argue that some of the behaviours inherent in social media learning (centred on fleeting connections, digital identity and discontinuous engagement) can create the conditions for effective learning through experience and practice, both at scale in open, online modes as well in the face-to-face delivery environment.

About the authors

Peter Bryant

Peter Bryant is the Head of Learning Technology and Innovation at the London School of Economics and Political Science. He leads programmes and initiatives to transform the educational experience at the LSE through the innovative use of technology and digital pedagogies. His team recently won the Overall Gold Award for innovative pedagogy at the Wharton-QS Stars Reimagine Education awards. He was previously a Principal Lecturer in Educational Technology and Development at the University of Greenwich. Prior to this role, Peter had over twenty years’ experience as a lecturer, Director of Programmes, Head of Department and curriculum designer, working into two countries and teaching programmes from work based learning, marketing, media and management. Peter is the co-founder of the Future Happens initiative which uses innovative approaches to problem-solving and change management to engage the wider sector in debates around technology, pedagogy and the future of the University.