Technology enhanced academic development: Exploring approaches for professional learning in higher education
Open fishbowl
Katharina Freund
Australian National University
@katiedigc
Sarah Thorneycroft
University of New England
@sthcrft
Emily Rutherford
University of Canberra
@tinselturtle
David Bruce Porter
University of Wollongong
Carole Hunter
Charles Sturt University
Catch this session
Monday 4 December, 3.30pm - 4.30pm
Stream 2
Room R113
Abstract
As universities move towards new methods of delivery for their teaching, academic development in higher education still relies heavily on face-to-face contact (Thorneycroft & Landrigan, 2014; Cochrane & Narayan, 2016). This fishbowl session will explore how technologies can facilitate new methods and paradigms for designing and delivering professional development. The combined pressures of increasing academic workloads and changing teaching methods make timely professional development essential and challenging (Gregory & Lodge, 2015). We will discuss the complexities and challenges of delivering effective staff professional development in this environment, and consider new solutions and opportunities using technologies. This session examines the issue of faculty professional development and how tools and technological innovations can inform and support effective practice.
The fishbowl participants represent a range of contexts in Australian higher education and will debate issues in professional development including:
Working with the limitations of staff time
Affordances and challenges for different modes of delivery, including face-to-face, self-paced, and synchronous online delivery
Working in partnership with faculty, central teams, and support teams
Options for encouraging, recognising, and incentivizing participation
Methods for recognition or credentialing professional development
Innovative and creative approaches to professional development
This session will present a realistic and research-informed view on the complexities of providing academic development in universities and will be of interest to educational designers, academic developers, academics, academic librarians, managers, and strategic leaders.
About the authors
Katharina Freund
Dr. Katharina Freund is a Senior Learning Designer at the Australian National University. She coordinates training and academic development on education technology, and leads educational design projects for ANU Online. Katharina completed her PhD in 2012 from the University of Wollongong on digital remix videos, fan practices, and online communities, and is a researcher on education technology and digital communication.
Sarah Thorneycroft
Sarah Thorneycroft is a Learning Designer at the University of New England. Her educational background is wide-ranging, including academic development, teacher professional development and primary and secondary teaching. She works extensively in the development of online teaching and learning, and researches in the fields of digital scholarship, practice-led innovation in teaching & learning, games-based learning and professional development.
Emily Rutherford
Emily Rutherford is an Educational Designer at the University of Canberra. She works in partnership with the academic staff from the Faculty of Business, Governance and Law on staff development projects, teaching strategies and innovation, as well as University-wide learning and teaching projects.
David Bruce Porter
Dr David Bruce Porter is Manager: Educational Technology in the University of Wollongong Faculty of Science, Medicine, & Health. David leads of team of technology-enhanced learning specialists to support and empower academics to use technology to innovate and transform student learning. David’s interests include educational technology leadership, academic support and development, and educational design.
Carole Hunter
Carole Hunter is a Lecturer in Online and Blended Learning in the Faculty of Business, Justice and Behavioural Sciences at Charles Sturt University. She currently leads a team of Educational Designers in a large scale initiative to foster innovation and enhanced online learning across the Faculty. She has over 20 years experience as a teacher, writer and learning designer in four countries. Her current research interests focus on humanising approaches to the leadership and management of large scale online design initiatives and academic development.
Constructive alignment of materials in tertiary programs
Full paper
Sook Jhee Yoon
The University of Melbourne
@sookjhee
Paul Gruba
The University of Melbourne
Catch this session
Wednesday 6 December, 12pm - 12.30pm
Stream 5
Room C204
Abstract
In blended tertiary programs, technology is mixed in face to face settings, and learning activities happen both on- and offline. With the move towards blended learning, tertiary programs and their curricula have become more varied and complicated. Such complexity and variation is evident, for example, in the program learning outcomes, learning activities and assessment tasks. Yet little is known how such complex factors interact, and thus influence, decisions regarding the curriculum in higher education settings from the perspective of administrators, lecturers and students. This study examines constructive alignment of materials in blended tertiary programs. Two case studies of blended programs in a large research intensive Australian university were studied. Using a pedagogical claims analysis as a means to structure the study, the researchers gathered and analysed qualitative data through a series of cycles, seeking to refine themes such that they are defensible, trustworthy and rigorous. Findings of the study point to factors that influence constructive alignment with implications for materials design and use.
About the authors
Sook Jhee Yoon
Sook Jhee Yoon is a Ph.D candidate in The University of Melbourne. Her areas of interest are materials development and the use of technology in language teaching.
Paul Gruba
Paul Gruba, originally trained as a journalist, works in areas of educational technology research to do with non-native speakers, blended language learning and language program evaluation. Paul is currently an associate editor for AJET.
CMALT cMOOC: Developing a scalable lecturer professional development framework
Full paper
Thomas Cochrane
Auckland University of Technology
@thomcochrane
Vickel Narayan
Auckland University of Technology
@vnarayan
Catch this session
Monday 4 December, 11am - 11.30am
Stream 2
Room R113
Abstract
This paper outlines the design stage of a project that reimagines lecturer professional development around a network of communities of practice scaffolded by a cMOOC (connectivist Massive Open Online Course), where sustained collaborative engagement with innovative teaching practice is recognised via established international peer-based professional accreditation pathways such as CMALT (Certified Member of the Association for Learning Technology). Informed by a design based research methodology, the CMALT cMOOC leverages a network of national and international collaboration and innovative teaching expertise, providing an agile and scalable framework to support the development of participants’ CMALT portfolios as evidence of critical engagement with new modes of practice and enhanced student outcomes. The cMOOC is designed based upon up-scaling the researchers’ community of practice (COP) model of lecturer professional development (Cochrane & Narayan, 2016c). Key to this model is the embedding of the scholarship of technology enhanced learning or SOTEL (Haynes, 2016), within lecturer praxis supported by a collaborative curriculum design process. The cMOOC provides a framework to support the development of lecturer COPs across a series of several weeks of participation throughout the academic year. The cMOOC is not conceptualised as a professional development course in the traditional sense, rather a mutual and collaborative initiative of willing participants to work together in order to enhance their understanding and knowledge of technology enhanced learning and teaching. Participation in the cMOOC is open, free and largely participant driven.
About the authors
Thomas Cochrane
Dr Thomas Cochrane is an academic advisor and senior lecturer in educational technology, the Centre for Learning And Teaching, Auckland University of Technology, New Zealand. Thomas is the coordinator of the Ascilite mobile learning special interest group, and a mobile learning researcher/practitioner. http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0192-6118
Vickel Narayan
Vickel Narayan is a Learning and Teaching Consultant at the Centre for Learning and Teaching (CfLAT) at the Auckland University of Technology.
PhD (Murdoch), MComp, PGDComp, GDHE, BSc (Comp Sc & Info Sys)
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6833-706X
Future happens: Hack your way to influencing and changing pedagogical and technological strategy and practice
Experimental session
Peter Bryant
London School of Economics and Political Science
@peterbryantHE
Catch this session
Monday 4 December, 3.30pm - 4.30pm
Stream 4
Room L209
Abstract
Using the changehack approach successfully run in the UK for the last two years by Future Happens (http://www.futurehappens.org - a collaboration between two leading UK institutions, the London School of Economics and the University of the Arts, London), this experimental session is designed to collectively engage participants in changing the discourses around the role of technology in shaping institutional/faculty wide pedagogical change. This lightning changehack will generate approaches to scaling and sustaining the lessons and innovations that arise from grassroots practice into approaches that can be included in strategic thinking across disciplines, levels, cohorts and potentially across the whole institution.
This workshop will challenge you to think about the ways you are able to influence your institutions strategic direction and commitments to technology and learning and be a part of the conversation that shapes how they do it. Attendees will participate in a collective hack that draws on the power of the crowd to solve problems. Previous Future Happens hacks in the UK have collectively generated insightful, useful and pragmatic ways to bridge the discourses between the practices of learning technology and how they can be scaled up to be part of the institutional, faculty or School wide strategic approach to innovative pedagogy. Attendees will collectively own the outputs which will be shared globally as part of the Future Happens movement.
About the authors
Peter Bryant
Peter Bryant is the Head of Learning Technology and Innovation at the London School of Economics and Political Science, UK. He leads programmes and initiatives to transform the educational experience at the LSE through the innovative use of technology and digital pedagogies. His team recently was the Overall Gold Award for Innovative Pedagogy at the Wharton-QS Stars Reimagine Education awards. He was previously a Principal Lecturer in Educational Technology and Development at the University of Greenwich. Peter has over twenty years’ experience as a lecturer, Head of Department and curriculum designer, working into two countries (in HE and VET). He is an active researcher in both educational technology and pedagogy. Peter is the co-founder of the Future Happens initiative which uses innovative approaches to problem-solving and change management to engage the wider sector in debates around technology, pedagogy and the future of the University.
Challenges and tensions in the role of the LMS for medical education: Time for the "next generation LMS"?
Full paper
Jill Lyall
Australian National University
@JillACTS
Katharina Freund
Australian National University
@katiedigc
Alexandra Webb
Australian National University
Catch this session
Monday 4 December, 11.30am - 12pm
Stream 1
Room H102 Allison Dickson Lecture Theatre
Abstract
In the context of discussions of a “next generation LMS” and other contemporary challenges in higher education, this case study looks at the iterative process a team of educational designers and Medical School academics used in a review of the Medical School LMS sites. Adopting the framework of the actor network theory, this reflective process discovered the tensions, dynamics and issues involved, and worked to gain and maintain key Medical School staff engagement and support for the review and for any changes that might be recommended. This paper reflects on emerging possible models for technology-enhanced learning beyond our current institutional LMS while acknowledging the institutional constraints on learning innovation within the global higher education context. Next generation LMS models may provide a more flexible future solution that could be applicable not just to medical education, but to higher education generally.
About the authors
Jill Lyall
Jill has a background in social sciences, community services, and adult education. Jill has worked for many years in Vocational Education and Training in a TAFE environment in Western Australia. During that time she developed an interest in technology for learning, and developed her skills for online learning. Since early 2015, Jill has been working on a range of projects with ANU Online, helping to create online materials for post-graduate courses and creating support and training resources in technology enhanced learning for academics at ANU.
Katharina Freund
Katie advises academics on eLearning design and initiatives, researches innovative solutions in education technology, creates digital media resources, and trains staff on Wattle (Moodle) learning management system and other digital tools for teaching and learning. She is also a researcher in education technology and digital communication.
Alexandra Webb
Dr Webb has more than 20 years experience teaching anatomy into undergraduate & postgraduate medicine, allied health & science programs in Australia & the United Kingdom. She has extensive proficiencies in leading the development & implementation of new curricula & resources. She is an innovative educator & educational researcher who takes measured risks in trialling the effectiveness of novel teaching & learning approaches such as serious games, touchscreen technology, adaptive learning, virtual patients & eBooks. In her current role, she is leading the development & implementation of technology enhanced learning & teaching for the School’s MChD as well as creating a flexible collaborative Professional Development program to build capacity in teaching & learning. Dr Webb’s educational practice has been recognised with multiple awards, including Senior Fellowship of the Higher Education Academy & a national Australian Award for University Teaching.
Playing the education system: Competing, exploring, socialising, distrupting, but always engaging
Experimental session
Dan Laurence
La Trobe University
@D4n_
Catch this session
Monday 4 December, 3.30pm - 4.30pm
Stream 6
Room T120
Abstract
Through discovering your ‘gamer type’ as part of this experimental session participants will actively explore, compete, socialise and disrupt their way into the enquiry: what aspects of the education system are ‘gameful’, and how do different students play?
There is contention around the usefulness of the idea that learners fall into different types. Some research shows that curating teaching based on ‘learning styles’ (sensory processing) is of questionable value. However, evidence from learning analytics shows that there are radically differently behaviours exhibited by students and there are impassioned calls for increased personalisation in education.
After a very brief introduction to some leading theories on student engagement we quickly segue into a ‘Gamer Type’ quiz that will determine participants teams. The teams will then compete live using a series of leading game/learning apps as we delve deeper into the enquiry of what aspects of education are gameful, are there different ways students play and if so, does it matter?
BYO device or phone.
About the authors
Dan Laurence
Dan Laurence is a senior educational designer and has taught Graduate Certificate students on the subject of games in education. In 2015 Dan won the Vice Chancellor’s Teaching Excellence award for his work designing and employing game principles at Swinburne University (and accounting for their impact). The following journal article [ http://rdcu.be/uOJG ] has been published detailing the implementation. Dan has a long prior history working in interactive media and has produced games that are used in in around 40 universities across the world.
By design: Facing the academic challenges of implementing technology enhanced learning in higher education and the example of a third year biology unit
Full paper
Brett Fyfield
Queensland University of Technology
@rainbowhill
Iwona Czaplinski
Queensland University of Technology
@IwonaCzaplinski
Catch this session
Wednesday 6 December, 11am - 11.30am
Stream 4
Room L209
Abstract
This paper takes a design research approach to the challenge of transforming learning and teaching in higher education (HE) as it is experienced at the level of an interdisciplinary team composed of content matter experts and specialists in education. It is based on the reflections of members of the team working collaboratively to transform an undergraduate biology unit to improve both student engagement and teaching staff satisfaction.
Using semi-structured interviews and reflective inquiry the authors attempt to uncover the salient features of the process of implementing technology enhanced learning, and generate constructive design solutions. The work is situated in the scholarship of learning and teaching as it encourages "reflection-in-action" and a commitment to sharing what works in STEM teaching and learning in contemporary environments. The teaching team focus on the complex problems of preparation, attendance, and engagement in a series of intensive labs, whilst the professional staff focus on the complex problems of innovation and student engagement in HE.
A number of known and hypothetical learning design principles are integrated with the affordances of the chosen learning environment (OneNote) and used to propose plausible solutions. These solutions are used to iteratively refine the learning environment and reveal new design principles. The paper emphasises the benefits of providing for and supporting the emergence of microcultures, and suggest strategies for those that wish to emulate the approach taken.
About the authors
Brett Fyfield
Brett Fyfield works with people and teams in education to improve learning and teaching through the appropriate use of technology. From his earliest beginnings as a multimedia developer he has designed and developed compelling user experiences in the classroom, online and in the real world that make the most of new media. Currently in his role as Instructional Multimedia Developer at QUT he works with academics, staff and students to develop and support technology enhanced learning. He is dedicated to transforming education through fostering personal and professional growth and promotes the use of design thinking in teams to produce new digital pedagogies. He is interested in understanding how casual conversations become the catalyst for change, and how their transformative power may be harnessed for broader organisational and social change.
Iwona Czaplinski
Iwona holds a Master in Applied Linguistics, an MPhil in Educational research and is currently enrolled in PhD programme in a School of Mathematical Sciences, at Queensland University of Technology (QUT). In her research, Iwona is looking at the ways of assisting modern Science, Technology Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) undergraduate students in becoming expert learners, that is strategic, resourceful and self-regulated. To this end, Iwona investigates students’ learning networks, their networked learning habits and the potential of using better the social, educational and technological affordances offered by new technologies, in the context of ever-changing learning environment.
A cross-disciplinary evaluation of digitally recorded feedback in higher education
Full paper
Michael Phillips
Monash University
@thinkingmike
Tracii Ryan
Monash University
@traciiryan
Michael Henderson
Monash University
@mjhenderson
Catch this session
Monday 4 December, 11.30am - 12pm
Stream 3
Room L206
Abstract
Research demonstrates that assessment feedback created using audio, video, and screencast recordings can offer advantages over text-based feedback. However, the majority of research and experience in this domain has largely been limited to a single disciplinary or cohort context. This project aimed to empirically investigate if recorded feedback (i.e. audio, video, and screencast) could be effectively implemented across different contexts, including disciplines. As part of this, teaching staff from five discrete subjects provided digitally recorded feedback to students on at least one assessment task. Assessment types included various forms of written assignments, completed by individuals or groups of students.
This paper reports on survey data collected from 351 students who received recorded feedback or text-based feedback. Survey respondents were enrolled in five subjects across four disciplines (Education, Pharmacy, Engineering, and Management). To triangulate the survey findings, interview data from nine students are also included. Overall, the findings indicate that students in all disciplines found digitally recorded feedback to be more satisfying, more useful, and more engaging than text-based feedback alone. However, these outcomes differed across contexts; results tended to be elevated in subjects with smaller cohorts, and when richer audiovisual modalities were used. However, in two of the cases students’, while still being overall positive, indicated that the feedback was less clear, usable and satisfying than indicated in other cases. These differences are explored and issues of teacher experience, cohort size, group assessment, and disciplinary cognate traditions are considered.
About the authors
Michael Henderson
Michael Henderson is an Associate Professor and Director of Graduate Studies in the Faculty of Education at Monash University. He researches and teaches on the topics of educational technology and instructional design, including ethics of social media use, and assessment feedback designs. Michael leads the OLT funded project Feedback for Learning and is a Lead Editor for AJET.
Michael Phillips
Michael Phillips is a Lecturer in the Faculty of Education, Monash University. His work focuses on the knowledge expert teachers develop when integrating educational technologies into their practice. Additionally, Michael researchers the ways in which expert teachers make active decisions about their classroom technology integration. Michael’s research regularly involves collaboration with colleagues from Australia, the United States, Europe, Asia and the sub-continent. Michael is a team member of the OLT funded project Feedback for Learning and leads the Learning with New Media research group. Michael is an Associate Editor for AJET.
Tracii Ryan
Dr Tracii Ryan is a Research Fellow in the Faculty of Education at Monash University. Tracii has research expertise relating to the motivations, outcomes, and individual differences associated with internet use. Tracii also has several years of experience working across a range of research projects within the higher education context, and her most recent work focuses on assessment and feedback.
A framework for program wide curriculum transformation
Full paper
Angela Nicolettou
RMIT University
@ANicolettou
Andrea Chester
RMIT University
Spiros Soulis
RMIT University
@SSoulis
Catch this session
Monday 4 December, 11.30am - 12pm
Stream 2
Room R113
Abstract
Designing and delivering higher education programs in a global climate of constant change, technological advances and uncertain futures leads to the need for curriculum transformation practices that are innovative and responsive.
This paper describes a university-wide approach to developing a framework for program level transformation that is strengths-based, data-informed and design-led. A strengths-based approach builds on good practice, creating a space that is positive and forward looking. Data-informed practice and the inclusion of data wranglers on the project allowed for conversations about the known, unknowns and desirable directions to take place and inform directions. Design-led practices introduced design thinking principles such a building empathy and co-design with students, alumni and industry. The emergent framework has three key stages: vision, design and build. The vision stage focuses on the program team, its students, industry and desired direction for transformation. The design stage focuses on defining challenges, ideating, co-designing and creating a plan for development. The build stage uses a rapid prototyping and iterative approach to development that incorporates user testing early in the stage.
The project has delivered a framework for program level transformation and innovation and has shown that a strengths-based approach that is data informed and engages with students as co-designers has the capacity to unite teams, inform program visions and allow for innovative practices to emerge. Taking a learner experience approach to design also highlighted the value in engaging students and industry in curriculum design from the start of the process rather than simply as end users.
About the authors
Angela Nicolettou
Angela Nicolettou is the Manager of the Digital Learning Team in the College of Design and Social Context at RMIT University. Angela has over 20 years experience in Higher Education, leading numerous curriculum design teams, teaching, program management of Graduate Certificates in tertiary teaching, academic development and educational design. A focus of Angela’s work has been teaching with educational technologies, curriculum design, assessment and sessional teacher training.
Andrea Chester
Andrea is the Head of the School of Education and Deputy Pro Vice-Chancellor, Learning and Teaching at RMIT University. She has a background in psychology education and practice, with more than 20 years experience as an academic. Over the years Andrea has taught across the psychology curriculum, with a particular interest in first year and transition issues and she continues to teach in both first and third year. Her research focuses on learning and teaching, with an emphasis on how social capital can enhance learning. Her work has explored how partnerships between students can be mutually beneficial, how partnerships between staff can enhance reflective practice and how partnerships between students and staff can be leveraged to transform learning.
Spiros Soulis
Spiros Soulis is a Learning Designer in the College of Design and Social Context at RMIT University. Spiros experience spans across ESL and higher education, in leading and managing countless learning design teams as well as high profile projects in learning and teaching. His main research areas are in Design Thinking, design for learning and learner experience.
Blended learning as a disruption in a vocational education building program
Full paper
Meg Colasante
La Trobe University
@meg_colasante
Cathy Hall-van den Elsen
RMIT University
Catch this session
Monday 4 December, 11am - 11.30am
Stream 4
Room L209
Abstract
A building and construction teaching team in a vocational education school (within a university in Melbourne) introduced a blended learning model to one-third of their program. Traditionally, building students are accustomed to a high ratio of face-to-face learning, therefore, this new model disrupted the experience of both teacher and student. The model was examined using e-learning evaluation research methodology and findings are presented using the framework of Glazer’s (2012) characteristics of blended learning. Examination of the program identified areas in need of attention, such as active learning and online interaction and communication. Finally the authors promote the use of Glazer’s framework as a pedagogical evaluation tool for blended learning designs, while drawing out a particular focus on teacher presence as a distinct item in this framework.
About the authors
Meg Colasante
Meg Colasante works at La Trobe University as Lecturer, Educational Development (Digital Learning Strategy), currently within the La Trobe Online team within La Trobe Learning and Teaching. This follows two decades of teaching, educational design, and academic development roles at RMIT University. Meg is also a PhD candidate with Deakin University, studying university teacher practices with digital video.
Cathy Hall-van den Elsen
Dr Cathy Hall-van den Elsen is a retired academic who has worked in learning and teaching for a number of years. Until August 2014 Cathy was the Senior Manager, Academic Development Group in the College of Business at RMIT University. Cathy has contributed to projects associated with the scholarship of learning and teaching, teacher induction, transnational teaching, and innovative teaching practices, and has recently consulted on several projects at RMIT University.