Internet of Things (IoT), PBL and 3D holographic modelling for smart agriculture education at The University of Queensland
Full paper
Kim Bryceson
The University of Queensland
@kimpob742
Amando Navas Borrero
The University of Queensland
Fabian Vasuian
The University of Queensland
Catch this session
Wednesday 6 December 12pm - 12.30pm
Stream 1
Room H102 Allison Dickson Lecture Theatre
Abstract
The project described in this paper builds an innovative educational ‘front end’ to exciting technological developments in real time biophysical data gathering that are currently happening at The University of Queensland (UQ)’s regional campus (UQ Gatton ~85km SW of Brisbane in SE Queensland), via an Internet of Things (IoT) UQ Smart Campus Project. This paper describes the technologies involved, the development of a multifaceted web-based interface (dashboard) to the data collected, problem based learning modules, and 3D modelling using the real time streaming data acquired through the Internet of Things (IoT) technology of the UQ Gatton Smart Campus Initiative. The idea is to produce innovative teaching and assessment modules for multiple different courses in the UQ Science Faculty. The challenges and workarounds and two examples of using the data collected for problem-based learning modules will be described. Some discussion is included on what these technologies could provide in relation to delivering virtual reality, augmented reality and mixed reality environments for further teaching & learning developments in the “E” space being trialed currently with partners UQ ITS, Telstra/Readify, and Labster.
About the authors
Kim Bryceson
Kim is Professor of Agribusiness and Associate Dean Academic of the Science Faculty at the University of Queensland. Early research involved developing and implementing computer and satellite technology for integrated pest management, drought monitoring, site specific management and agribusiness decision support system development with the Commonwealth and Qld State governments. Over the last 15 years in academe she has been involved in agrifood supply and value chain analysis domestically and internationally with particular focus on using various modelling tools to construct supply chain risk assessment and performance management scenarios. She is the Director of the Agricultural Remote Sensing Laboratory at UQ’s Gatton campus where the collection of real time streaming Big Data through an Internet of Things infrastructure, plus the design, building and use of small drone technology and robotics for agricultural and environmental monitoring and sub-tropical agricultural research and teaching, is flourishing.
Amando Navas Borrero
An electrical engineer by first degree and professional experience, Armando has a family background in the cattle industry and is currently undertaking a PhD at the Agricultural Remote Sensing Lab at UQGatton specialising in the development and operationalisation of an Internet of Things data collection infrastructure as a tool for creating better management solutions for farmers
Fabian Vasuian
Fabian has completed a dual BEng / BSc in 2016 at UQ and after completing the required Internship for the BEng at the Agricultural Remote Sensing Lab in 2015/2016 at UQGatton, he is now working as a Systems Engineer with the UQ Gatton Smart Campus Internet of Things project, primarily delivering on the Data Dashboard product
Micro-credentialing is the future of higher education
Debate
Ekaterina Pechenkina
Swinburne University of Technology
@DrKatya_Pech
Juliet Buchanan
Swinburne University of Technology
Catch this session
Monday 4 December, 2.30pm - 3pm
Stream 3
Room L206
Abstract
The debate features an education researcher and a learning designer coming together to discuss pros and cons of micro-credentialing. Traditionally understood as an alternative credentialing practice, micro-credentialing draws on the principles of the competency-based approach and employs various micro-rewards (e.g. digital badges) to signify learner achievements, such as mastering a skill or gaining knowledge of a particular subject. Micro-credentialing can also be understood more broadly as a dis/re-aggregation of learning process, in which students are allowed greater control over their educational pathway choices. In addition to discussing benefits and challenges associated with increased student control over their learning, the debate addresses other matters of relevance to micro-credentialing, such as universities’ responsiveness to student expectations and how micro-credentialing can be used to improve graduate outcomes in alignment with industry specific needs. The learning designer will debate the affirmative side and the academic will debate the negative side of micro-credentialing, leaving it up to the audience to decide who makes the most convincing argument.
About the authors
Ekaterina Pechenkina
Dr Katya (Ekaterina) Pechenkina is Research Fellow at the Learning Transformations Unit, Swinburne University of Technology. Katya holds a PhD in anthropology from the University of Melbourne and several other degrees. She was a 2003-2004 International Research and Exchange Board fellow at the California State University Bakersfield, where she majored in sociology. Anthropologist and education researcher, Katya’s research interests encompass the discourses of technology, innovation, teaching excellence, and Indigenous experiences in higher education. Katya has published widely and serves as a peer reviewer for several major journals, conferences and publishers. Katya is a member of the teaching team delivering Swinburne’s Graduate Certificate in Learning and Teaching (Higher Education): she convenes and teaches a unit focusing on scholarly teaching designed to help academic staff to explore, evaluate and improve their teaching practices. Katya is an avid social media user and can be found on Twitter @DrKatya_Pech and Facebook @DrKatyaPech
Juliet Buchanan
Ms Juliet Buchanan is a Senior Learning Designer based at Learning Transformations Unit, Swinburne University of Technology. Juliet obtained a Master of Education from the University of Melbourne (2011), a Postgraduate Diploma in Computer Education, The University of Melbourne, 1999 and a Bachelor of Arts (Education), Deakin University. Juliet has a broad range of educational experience in a range of institutions including learning design at Monash and Swinburne universities; learning design experience in Australasian specialist medical colleges, RACMA, RVTS and RACS; teaching experience in primary schools, TAFE and industry experience, training Flight Attendants at QANTAS. Juliet has experience across institutions and in industry designing and creating LMS and online modules.
Challenges and tensions in the role of the LMS for medical education: Time for the "next generation LMS"?
Full paper
Jill Lyall
Australian National University
@JillACTS
Katharina Freund
Australian National University
@katiedigc
Alexandra Webb
Australian National University
Catch this session
Monday 4 December, 11.30am - 12pm
Stream 1
Room H102 Allison Dickson Lecture Theatre
Abstract
In the context of discussions of a “next generation LMS” and other contemporary challenges in higher education, this case study looks at the iterative process a team of educational designers and Medical School academics used in a review of the Medical School LMS sites. Adopting the framework of the actor network theory, this reflective process discovered the tensions, dynamics and issues involved, and worked to gain and maintain key Medical School staff engagement and support for the review and for any changes that might be recommended. This paper reflects on emerging possible models for technology-enhanced learning beyond our current institutional LMS while acknowledging the institutional constraints on learning innovation within the global higher education context. Next generation LMS models may provide a more flexible future solution that could be applicable not just to medical education, but to higher education generally.
About the authors
Jill Lyall
Jill has a background in social sciences, community services, and adult education. Jill has worked for many years in Vocational Education and Training in a TAFE environment in Western Australia. During that time she developed an interest in technology for learning, and developed her skills for online learning. Since early 2015, Jill has been working on a range of projects with ANU Online, helping to create online materials for post-graduate courses and creating support and training resources in technology enhanced learning for academics at ANU.
Katharina Freund
Katie advises academics on eLearning design and initiatives, researches innovative solutions in education technology, creates digital media resources, and trains staff on Wattle (Moodle) learning management system and other digital tools for teaching and learning. She is also a researcher in education technology and digital communication.
Alexandra Webb
Dr Webb has more than 20 years experience teaching anatomy into undergraduate & postgraduate medicine, allied health & science programs in Australia & the United Kingdom. She has extensive proficiencies in leading the development & implementation of new curricula & resources. She is an innovative educator & educational researcher who takes measured risks in trialling the effectiveness of novel teaching & learning approaches such as serious games, touchscreen technology, adaptive learning, virtual patients & eBooks. In her current role, she is leading the development & implementation of technology enhanced learning & teaching for the School’s MChD as well as creating a flexible collaborative Professional Development program to build capacity in teaching & learning. Dr Webb’s educational practice has been recognised with multiple awards, including Senior Fellowship of the Higher Education Academy & a national Australian Award for University Teaching.
Playing the education system: Competing, exploring, socialising, distrupting, but always engaging
Experimental session
Dan Laurence
La Trobe University
@D4n_
Catch this session
Monday 4 December, 3.30pm - 4.30pm
Stream 6
Room T120
Abstract
Through discovering your ‘gamer type’ as part of this experimental session participants will actively explore, compete, socialise and disrupt their way into the enquiry: what aspects of the education system are ‘gameful’, and how do different students play?
There is contention around the usefulness of the idea that learners fall into different types. Some research shows that curating teaching based on ‘learning styles’ (sensory processing) is of questionable value. However, evidence from learning analytics shows that there are radically differently behaviours exhibited by students and there are impassioned calls for increased personalisation in education.
After a very brief introduction to some leading theories on student engagement we quickly segue into a ‘Gamer Type’ quiz that will determine participants teams. The teams will then compete live using a series of leading game/learning apps as we delve deeper into the enquiry of what aspects of education are gameful, are there different ways students play and if so, does it matter?
BYO device or phone.
About the authors
Dan Laurence
Dan Laurence is a senior educational designer and has taught Graduate Certificate students on the subject of games in education. In 2015 Dan won the Vice Chancellor’s Teaching Excellence award for his work designing and employing game principles at Swinburne University (and accounting for their impact). The following journal article [ http://rdcu.be/uOJG ] has been published detailing the implementation. Dan has a long prior history working in interactive media and has produced games that are used in in around 40 universities across the world.
By design: Facing the academic challenges of implementing technology enhanced learning in higher education and the example of a third year biology unit
Full paper
Brett Fyfield
Queensland University of Technology
@rainbowhill
Iwona Czaplinski
Queensland University of Technology
@IwonaCzaplinski
Catch this session
Wednesday 6 December, 11am - 11.30am
Stream 4
Room L209
Abstract
This paper takes a design research approach to the challenge of transforming learning and teaching in higher education (HE) as it is experienced at the level of an interdisciplinary team composed of content matter experts and specialists in education. It is based on the reflections of members of the team working collaboratively to transform an undergraduate biology unit to improve both student engagement and teaching staff satisfaction.
Using semi-structured interviews and reflective inquiry the authors attempt to uncover the salient features of the process of implementing technology enhanced learning, and generate constructive design solutions. The work is situated in the scholarship of learning and teaching as it encourages "reflection-in-action" and a commitment to sharing what works in STEM teaching and learning in contemporary environments. The teaching team focus on the complex problems of preparation, attendance, and engagement in a series of intensive labs, whilst the professional staff focus on the complex problems of innovation and student engagement in HE.
A number of known and hypothetical learning design principles are integrated with the affordances of the chosen learning environment (OneNote) and used to propose plausible solutions. These solutions are used to iteratively refine the learning environment and reveal new design principles. The paper emphasises the benefits of providing for and supporting the emergence of microcultures, and suggest strategies for those that wish to emulate the approach taken.
About the authors
Brett Fyfield
Brett Fyfield works with people and teams in education to improve learning and teaching through the appropriate use of technology. From his earliest beginnings as a multimedia developer he has designed and developed compelling user experiences in the classroom, online and in the real world that make the most of new media. Currently in his role as Instructional Multimedia Developer at QUT he works with academics, staff and students to develop and support technology enhanced learning. He is dedicated to transforming education through fostering personal and professional growth and promotes the use of design thinking in teams to produce new digital pedagogies. He is interested in understanding how casual conversations become the catalyst for change, and how their transformative power may be harnessed for broader organisational and social change.
Iwona Czaplinski
Iwona holds a Master in Applied Linguistics, an MPhil in Educational research and is currently enrolled in PhD programme in a School of Mathematical Sciences, at Queensland University of Technology (QUT). In her research, Iwona is looking at the ways of assisting modern Science, Technology Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) undergraduate students in becoming expert learners, that is strategic, resourceful and self-regulated. To this end, Iwona investigates students’ learning networks, their networked learning habits and the potential of using better the social, educational and technological affordances offered by new technologies, in the context of ever-changing learning environment.
A cross-disciplinary evaluation of digitally recorded feedback in higher education
Full paper
Michael Phillips
Monash University
@thinkingmike
Tracii Ryan
Monash University
@traciiryan
Michael Henderson
Monash University
@mjhenderson
Catch this session
Monday 4 December, 11.30am - 12pm
Stream 3
Room L206
Abstract
Research demonstrates that assessment feedback created using audio, video, and screencast recordings can offer advantages over text-based feedback. However, the majority of research and experience in this domain has largely been limited to a single disciplinary or cohort context. This project aimed to empirically investigate if recorded feedback (i.e. audio, video, and screencast) could be effectively implemented across different contexts, including disciplines. As part of this, teaching staff from five discrete subjects provided digitally recorded feedback to students on at least one assessment task. Assessment types included various forms of written assignments, completed by individuals or groups of students.
This paper reports on survey data collected from 351 students who received recorded feedback or text-based feedback. Survey respondents were enrolled in five subjects across four disciplines (Education, Pharmacy, Engineering, and Management). To triangulate the survey findings, interview data from nine students are also included. Overall, the findings indicate that students in all disciplines found digitally recorded feedback to be more satisfying, more useful, and more engaging than text-based feedback alone. However, these outcomes differed across contexts; results tended to be elevated in subjects with smaller cohorts, and when richer audiovisual modalities were used. However, in two of the cases students’, while still being overall positive, indicated that the feedback was less clear, usable and satisfying than indicated in other cases. These differences are explored and issues of teacher experience, cohort size, group assessment, and disciplinary cognate traditions are considered.
About the authors
Michael Henderson
Michael Henderson is an Associate Professor and Director of Graduate Studies in the Faculty of Education at Monash University. He researches and teaches on the topics of educational technology and instructional design, including ethics of social media use, and assessment feedback designs. Michael leads the OLT funded project Feedback for Learning and is a Lead Editor for AJET.
Michael Phillips
Michael Phillips is a Lecturer in the Faculty of Education, Monash University. His work focuses on the knowledge expert teachers develop when integrating educational technologies into their practice. Additionally, Michael researchers the ways in which expert teachers make active decisions about their classroom technology integration. Michael’s research regularly involves collaboration with colleagues from Australia, the United States, Europe, Asia and the sub-continent. Michael is a team member of the OLT funded project Feedback for Learning and leads the Learning with New Media research group. Michael is an Associate Editor for AJET.
Tracii Ryan
Dr Tracii Ryan is a Research Fellow in the Faculty of Education at Monash University. Tracii has research expertise relating to the motivations, outcomes, and individual differences associated with internet use. Tracii also has several years of experience working across a range of research projects within the higher education context, and her most recent work focuses on assessment and feedback.
A framework for program wide curriculum transformation
Full paper
Angela Nicolettou
RMIT University
@ANicolettou
Andrea Chester
RMIT University
Spiros Soulis
RMIT University
@SSoulis
Catch this session
Monday 4 December, 11.30am - 12pm
Stream 2
Room R113
Abstract
Designing and delivering higher education programs in a global climate of constant change, technological advances and uncertain futures leads to the need for curriculum transformation practices that are innovative and responsive.
This paper describes a university-wide approach to developing a framework for program level transformation that is strengths-based, data-informed and design-led. A strengths-based approach builds on good practice, creating a space that is positive and forward looking. Data-informed practice and the inclusion of data wranglers on the project allowed for conversations about the known, unknowns and desirable directions to take place and inform directions. Design-led practices introduced design thinking principles such a building empathy and co-design with students, alumni and industry. The emergent framework has three key stages: vision, design and build. The vision stage focuses on the program team, its students, industry and desired direction for transformation. The design stage focuses on defining challenges, ideating, co-designing and creating a plan for development. The build stage uses a rapid prototyping and iterative approach to development that incorporates user testing early in the stage.
The project has delivered a framework for program level transformation and innovation and has shown that a strengths-based approach that is data informed and engages with students as co-designers has the capacity to unite teams, inform program visions and allow for innovative practices to emerge. Taking a learner experience approach to design also highlighted the value in engaging students and industry in curriculum design from the start of the process rather than simply as end users.
About the authors
Angela Nicolettou
Angela Nicolettou is the Manager of the Digital Learning Team in the College of Design and Social Context at RMIT University. Angela has over 20 years experience in Higher Education, leading numerous curriculum design teams, teaching, program management of Graduate Certificates in tertiary teaching, academic development and educational design. A focus of Angela’s work has been teaching with educational technologies, curriculum design, assessment and sessional teacher training.
Andrea Chester
Andrea is the Head of the School of Education and Deputy Pro Vice-Chancellor, Learning and Teaching at RMIT University. She has a background in psychology education and practice, with more than 20 years experience as an academic. Over the years Andrea has taught across the psychology curriculum, with a particular interest in first year and transition issues and she continues to teach in both first and third year. Her research focuses on learning and teaching, with an emphasis on how social capital can enhance learning. Her work has explored how partnerships between students can be mutually beneficial, how partnerships between staff can enhance reflective practice and how partnerships between students and staff can be leveraged to transform learning.
Spiros Soulis
Spiros Soulis is a Learning Designer in the College of Design and Social Context at RMIT University. Spiros experience spans across ESL and higher education, in leading and managing countless learning design teams as well as high profile projects in learning and teaching. His main research areas are in Design Thinking, design for learning and learner experience.
Blended learning as a disruption in a vocational education building program
Full paper
Meg Colasante
La Trobe University
@meg_colasante
Cathy Hall-van den Elsen
RMIT University
Catch this session
Monday 4 December, 11am - 11.30am
Stream 4
Room L209
Abstract
A building and construction teaching team in a vocational education school (within a university in Melbourne) introduced a blended learning model to one-third of their program. Traditionally, building students are accustomed to a high ratio of face-to-face learning, therefore, this new model disrupted the experience of both teacher and student. The model was examined using e-learning evaluation research methodology and findings are presented using the framework of Glazer’s (2012) characteristics of blended learning. Examination of the program identified areas in need of attention, such as active learning and online interaction and communication. Finally the authors promote the use of Glazer’s framework as a pedagogical evaluation tool for blended learning designs, while drawing out a particular focus on teacher presence as a distinct item in this framework.
About the authors
Meg Colasante
Meg Colasante works at La Trobe University as Lecturer, Educational Development (Digital Learning Strategy), currently within the La Trobe Online team within La Trobe Learning and Teaching. This follows two decades of teaching, educational design, and academic development roles at RMIT University. Meg is also a PhD candidate with Deakin University, studying university teacher practices with digital video.
Cathy Hall-van den Elsen
Dr Cathy Hall-van den Elsen is a retired academic who has worked in learning and teaching for a number of years. Until August 2014 Cathy was the Senior Manager, Academic Development Group in the College of Business at RMIT University. Cathy has contributed to projects associated with the scholarship of learning and teaching, teacher induction, transnational teaching, and innovative teaching practices, and has recently consulted on several projects at RMIT University.
A learning analytics view of students’ use of self-regulation strategies for essay writing
Full paper
Kelly Trezise
University of Melbourne
@Kelly_Trezise
Paula de Barba
University of Melbourne
@paula_barba
David Jennens
Vericus Pty Ltd
@cadmus_io
Alexander Zarebski
Vericus Pty Ltd
Robert Russo
Vericus Pty Ltd
@cadmus_io
Gregor Kennedy
University of Melbourne
Catch this session
Monday 4 December, 10.30am - 11am
Stream 5
Room C204
Abstract
Essay writing is a fundamental part of higher education. Students’ use of self-regulatory skills, such as time management and planning and writing strategies, while writing essays predicts better writing quality. Current characterisations of the relationship between self-regulation and essay writing are limited by the difficulty of assessing self-regulation in real-life essay writing contexts.
This paper reports on a novel approach to examine students’ use of self-regulation strategies in a real-life setting, using learning analytics. Four case studies are presented to illustrate similarities and differences in students’ use of time management and planning and writing strategies. Participants managed their time in very different ways to complete the assignment. They were active over a different number of days, engaged in sessions of different durations, and at different times of the day. The participants used variety of approaches to their writing: one participant started early and allowed editing time, another typed gradually over a number of days, and two participants waited until the due date to complete the essay, with varying amounts of editing. Findings from this research contribute to a novel detailed empirical evidence of different essay preparation behaviour in real-life settings. After further studies with a variety of essay types and student samples, there may be significant value in using the approach outlined in this paper as the basis of tools to provide students with advice and support in their essay preparation.
About the authors
Kelly Trezise
Dr Trezise is currently a Research Fellow at the Melbourne Centre for the Study of Higher Education, working with the Educational Technology Research Group. She also works at the Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences. She is primarily interested in identifying individual differences in patterns of learning. Dr Trezise researches how cognition, emotion, and educational contexts, and their effect on learning processes and educational outcomes. With the CHSE she examines how educational technology and cognition interact during learning. Kelly uses a variety of analytical methods, including finite mixture models, to examine processes that contribute to learning and development. In her PhD completed at the Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, Kelly examined maths anxiety¬cognition interactions and their relationship with algebraic problem solving in adolescents.
Paula de Barba
Paula de Barba is a Research Fellow in Higher Education with the Melbourne Centre for the Study of Higher Education at The University of Melbourne. Her current research is in the areas of educational psychology and educational technology. Paula is interested on how students' cognition and emotions influence their learning, and how technology can support and promote learning. Constructs investigated include self-regulated learning, achievement motivation, interest, and feedback.
David Jennens
David holds a PhD in Particle Physics from The University of Melbourne on measuring the decay rate of the Higgs Boson into tau lepton pairs. He performed his research in collaboration with the ATLAS experiment at the Large Hadron Collider with the European Organisation for Nuclear Research (CERN) and the Center of Excellence for Particle Physics (COEPP). During this research period he contributed to the ATLAS detector calibrations. This work led to him being included on the ATLAS collaboration author list for several papers, including the discovery of the Higgs Boson. David currently leads a team using data collected through Cadmus to improve the quality of teaching and learning at universities.
Alexander Zarebski
I am an applied mathematician in the University of Melbourne's School of Mathematics and Statistics. After obtaining a Master's degree in mathematics and statistics in 2014, I turned my attention towards modelling infectious diseases, primarily influenza, to produce forecasts of transmission through the population. In addition to my work in quantitative epidemiology, I have a keen interest in education. This has led me to tutor a range of subjects in the School of Mathematics and Statistics. I also work as a data scientist at the technology start-up Vericus where I develop algorithms to analyse students' interactions with educational technology.
Robert Russo
Robert is the Chief Product Officer at Cadmus and is responsible for product strategy. Robert graduated in 2014 from the University of Melbourne with a Masters of Engineering. Under Robert, Cadmus’ focus has been on ensuring all product decisions align with best teaching and learning practice.
Gregor Kennedy
Gregor Kennedy is Pro Vice-Chancellor (Teaching and Learning) at the University of Melbourne and Director of the Melbourne Centre for the Study of Higher Education. Gregor is an international leader in educational technology research and development, particularly in the context of higher education. He has longstanding research interests in contemporary learning design and emerging technologies, educational technology research and evaluation, interactivity and engagement in digital learning, 3D immersive virtual environments, and the use of learning analytics in digital learning environments. He has published widely in these areas and is a regular keynote and invited presenter at local and international conferences. As Pro Vice-Chancellor (Teaching and Learning) Gregor leads the University's strategy in teaching, learning and assessment, curriculum innovation, and the use of learning technologies and learning analytics.
Addressing inconsistency in use of the LMS: A collaborative approach
Full paper
Elizabeth Masterman
University of Oxford, UK
@acitoxford
Catch this session
Monday 4 December, 10.30am - 11am
Stream 1
Room H102
Abstract
Inconsistency in the use of the learning management system (LMS) by academic staff is a source of dissatisfaction among university students in the UK. One solution is to establish a set of minimum standards (or baseline) for LMS use within an individual institution. Another is to supply templates – frameworks for LMS course sites – with a view to providing students with a seamless experience in their interactions with the LMS.
This paper describes how the issue of inconsistency was addressed at a leading research university in the UK through an exploratory project, WebLearn Improved Student Experience (WISE). The widespread devolution of responsibility for site management to administrative staff, together with the ‘maverick’ creation of course sites by those academics who chose to engage with the WebLearn LMS, had resulted in unevenness in students’ access to learning materials. The project team engaged in close collaboration with 19 departments in order to achieve the immediate purpose of improving uptake of, and consistency in, their LMS presence. The ultimate aim was to develop a support package comprising LMS templates and ‘best practice’ guidelines that would enable departments in the future to achieve the same objective, either unsupported or with minimal assistance from the central team of learning technologists. The project was evaluated using a modification of the Innovation Histories method. The evaluation findings additionally threw into relief the complex social and cultural factors at play that can inhibit a consistent student experience in an institutional LMS.
About the authors
Elizabeth Masterman
Liz Masterman holds a PhD in Educational Technology from the University of Birmingham, UK, and is a senior researcher in the Academic IT Services group at the University of Oxford. Her research focused initially on Learning Design; projects included an evaluation of LAMS, and the Phoebe Pedagogy Planner and Learning Designer tools. Liz has also conducted research into the student digital experience, OER and open educational practice. She is currently involved in three institutional projects: a review of the centrally supported LMS, a trial of electronic essay exams, and the design and implementation of a Learning Design model for Oxford. Other activities include editing the Academic IT Services blog and co-ordinating the annual OxTALENT competition, which rewards the creative use of technology in teaching, learning, research and outreach at the University. In 2015 Liz co-chaired the annual conference of the UK’s Association for Learning Technology.